Fukushima: Radiation tripled in some albacore tuna off West Coast after Fukushima — Bioaccumulating in bones, not only flesh — “Additional exposures to plume could further increase radiation levels” — NOAA-funded study to expand after ‘significant’ findings — [& Dr. Helen Caldicott]…


Reuters, Apr. 29, 2014: A sample of albacore tuna caught off the shores of Oregon and Washington state have small levels of radioactivity from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, researchers said on Tuesday. […]

USA Today, Apr. 28, 2014: Radiation in some albacore tuna caught off the Oregon coast tripled […] The study is the first to look at different parts of the fish. […] exposure to the plume could further increase radiation levels in the albacore [– it’s] expected to reach the West Coast this month. Federal agencies aren’t testing for it, but the Oregon Health Authority tests quarterly samples of seawater […] No Oregon agency does radiation testing on seafood […]

Oregon St. University, Apr. 28, 2014: The researchers tested […] loins, carcass and guts and found varying levels […] this is one of the first studies to look at different parts of the fish. “The loins, or muscle, is what people eat and the bioaccumulation was about the same there as in the carcass,” said Jason Phillips, a research associate […] study was supported by [OSU & NOAA]

Environmental Science and Technology, Apr. 24, 2014: 26 Pacific albacore caught off the Pacific Northwest U.S. coast between 2008 and 2012 were analyzed for 137Cs and Fukushima-attributed 134Cs. Both 2011 (2 of 2) and several 2012 (10 of 17) edible tissue samples exhibited increased activity concentrations of 137Cs (234–824 mBq/kg of wet weight) and 134Cs (18.2–356 mBq/kg of wet weight).

RT, Apr. 29, 2014: “A year of eating albacore with these cesium traces is about the same dose of radiation as you get from spending 23 seconds in a stuffy basement from radon gas,” the study’s lead author, Delvan Neville said to Oregon’s Statesman Journal. Still, Neville added that the discovery of any amount of radiation is significant. “You can’t say there is absolutely zero risk because any radiation is assumed to carry at least some small risk,” he said. […] Since the results did reveal a spike in radiation, though, the researchers will be expanding their study beyond Oregon to test a larger number of tuna across the West Coast.

Daily Sundial, Apr. 14, 2014: At CSUN’s West Gallery in the art department, professor Edie Pistolesi, with the help of several other art professors, worked with about 160 students to create a radioactive seafood market […] “Three years later, it’s not getting better,” Pistolesi said. “We’re paying attention to this new kind of garbage that’s destroying the planet. You can’t see it, but it’s in the water and it’s in the fish.” […] “We’re using beauty as a weapon to show everyone who sees this that there’s something wrong here,” Pistolesi said.

Listen to the KLCC broadcast here

Delvan Nevilles comment is the usually idiocy, comparing ingested cesium and other fish flesh radioactivity to inhaling an invented number of seconds (23?) in a radon stuffy basement. just nonsense and false comparisons with no science of merit. And I am grateful to Admin for posting these comments, no surprise, no surprise. I keep posting on list serves, and asking my friends…are you still eating fish? Really?

One Comment

Are we enjoying being poisoned yet? The poisioning is not the actual issue. It is who is committing the crime against us and future generations. Mass murder needs to be seen as a crime. Otherwise we are toast. Psychopaths will continue to acceleratre the schedule and expansiveness of their mass murder otherwise. The cabal of psychopaths ruling us may not be vulnerable to justice, but the greater crime is the attitude of denial on the part of the rest of us that enables the pattern of injustice perpetrated by depraved.