Welcome back to the Dark Ages…

Common Dreams
Thanks to Linda Sanders

We are witnessing an epochal shift in our socio-political world.  We are de-evolving, hurtling headlong into a past that was defined by serfs and lords; by necromancy and superstition; by policies based on fiat, not facts.

Much of what has made the modern world in general, and the United States in particular, a free and prosperous society comes directly from insights that arose during the Enlightenment.

Too bad we’re chucking it all out and returning to the Dark Ages.


Two main things distinguished the post Enlightenment world from the pre Enlightenment Dark Ages.

First, Francis Bacon’s Novo Organum Scientiarum (The New Instrument of Science) introduced a new way of understanding the world, in which empiricism, facts and … well … reality … defined what was real. It essentially outlined the scientific method:  observation and data collection, formulation of hypotheses, experiments designed to test hypotheses and elevation of these hypotheses to theories when data consistently supported them.  It was and is a system based on skepticism, and a relentless and methodical search for truth.

It brought us advances and untold wealth and health.  From one-horse carts to automobiles to airplanes. From leaches and phrenology to penicillin and monoclonal antibodies.

Until recently.

Now, we seek to operate by revealed truths, not reality.  Decrees from on high – often issued by an unholy alliance of religious fundamentalists, self-interested corporations, and greedy fat cats – are offered up as reality by rightwing politicians.

For example, North Carolina law-makers recently passed legislation against sea level rise.  A day later, the Virginia legislature required that references to global warming, climate change and sea level rise be excised from a proposed study on sea level rise.  Last year, the Texas Department of Environmental Quality, which had commissioned a study on Galveston Bay, cut all references to sea level rise – the main point of the study.

We are, indeed, at an epochal threshold.

As Stephen Colbert so aptly put it: if your science gives you results you don’t like, pass a law saying that the result is illegal. Problem solved.

Except it isn’t.  Wishing reality away, doesn’t make it go away.  Pretending that the unreal is real doesn’t make it real.

And the descent into the Dark Ages is marked by more than global warming. Take austerity budgets. There is an extensive historical record showing that implementing austerity measures in an economic slowdown is counter productive. And this data is backed up by current experience in Europe, where austerity measures have been disastrous.

So the data is telling us austerity during a jobs crisis hasn’t worked in the past and isn’t working now.  What to do?

Pass an austerity budget, of course.

Welcome to the Dark Ages.

The litany of ignorance goes on and on. Teach Creationism.  Teach the “controversy” on climate science and intelligent design.  Declare deregulation – which was a primary cause of the 2008 economic collapse – to be the solution to it. Preach trickle down economics, even after it has failed every time it’s been adopted; even as we watch wealth rocket up the income brackets.

What’s next?  Give the flat-earthers a say.  Oh hell, why stop there. Let’s put Earth back in the center of the solar system where it belongs.

We don’t need no stinkin’ science.  We don’t need no pesky reality.  We just gotta pass a few laws and declare things to be the way we want them to be, facts be damned.  You know, keep your government hands off my Medicare.

Second, the Enlightenment laid the groundwork for our form of government. The Social Contract is the intellectual basis of all modern democratic republics, including ours.  John Locke and others argued that governments derived their authority from the governed, not from divine right.  Governments could be legitimate, then, only with the consent of the governed.

Jefferson acknowledged Locke’s influence on the Declaration of Independence and his ideas are evident in the Constitution.

Here again, our founders used reason, empiricism and academic scholarship to cobble together one of the most enduring and influential documents in human history.  For all its flaws, it has steered us steadily toward a more perfect union.

Until recently.

Now, reason, empiricism and scholarship are the punch line to right wing jokes and jihads.  Santorum captured the Tea Party’s hostility to these Enlightenment virtues when he likened a college education to an indoctrination.  Thankfully, Santorum is gone, but the embrace of ignorance he advocated lives on.

And so corporations are now accorded the rights of citizenship.  Power, once again, is meted out by birthright, not inalienable right.  By possession of wealth, not by justice or equity or merit.

So what?

Well, the US now has the same income inequality as Cameroon, Uganda and Rwanda, and we’re trapped in this pathetic state – income mobility in the US lags behind most other developed nations.

In short, Horatio Alger is dead, long live Exxon.

We are, indeed, at an epochal threshold.  We can continue to discard the Enlightenment values which enabled both an untold increase in material wealth and a system of government which turned serfs into citizens.  A system which – for all its flaws – often managed to protect the rights of the many, against the predatory power of the few.

Or we can continue our abject surrender to myths, magical thinking, and self-delusion and the Medieval nation-state those forces are resurrecting.

Republicans and Tea Partiers may be leading this retreat from reason, but they are unopposed by Democrats or the Press.

And in the end, there is a special place in Hell for those who allow evil to prosper by doing nothing.

One Comment

This article suffers from all the worst blog features. For instance, it tosses around terms like the Enlightenment and the Dark Ages in a superficial and misleading ways. It supposes that science is about Truth, which two other Enlightenment masters, David Hume and Immanuel Kant, demolished as those scientists lately studying quantum mechanics, emergent systems, and psychic abilities are confirming in spades. Any investigation of John Locke would quickly uncover he was no friend of the type of democracy advocated by Jefferson, but one with property in control. To shine sufficient light on this subject in any depth would take many pages, not a handful of paragraphs and, sigh, most wouldn’t be interested. We’ve been so attuned to in your face Fox-style “news” and “commentary”, always authoritatively presented, that most of us appear to have ceased to think. Witness recent election results. Nonetheless, a few words with the English example specifically in mind:

Until the later sixteenth century, which was seven hundred years after the so-called Dark Ages ended and a hundred years before the so-called Age of Enlightenment, the most populous class by far consisted of peasants. While lords, ladies, and bishops “owned” everything, they knew nothing about farming and left the peasants alone except to collect taxes, rents, or tithes. Then, the sea lanes opened up trade and merchant wealth began to grow. They saw an opportunity to turn peasant properties to profit by buying them from the lords and converting them to intensive farming, sheep raising and such. The commons were plowed, the forests cut, and the peasants driven off to starve in cities or be shipped overseas. For two decades during the seventeenth century, the English Revolution slowed this process, but this was soon followed by Cromwell, the Restoration with the wealthy merchants controlling Parliament, and development of Newcastle coal. The Enlightenment science burst was funded by these merchants for their entertainment and profit. It was an age of child labor, debtor prisons, indentured labor, and hanging the sentence following conviction for almost two hundred “crimes”, mostly economic; it was the age of coal fires and soot. Property was king, which continued to be the Rule Britannica rule during the following century of Charles Dickens and Queen Victoria. Please notice how demonstrations by those in need are now handled in England (and the United States) today.

Meanwhile, the wealthy American property owner class had achieved independence. Shortly, thanks to the Civil War and Rockefeller’s oil, the industrial age boomed. Most American remained in effect peasant farmers, but their lives were increasingly controlled by the merchants. Science continued to be a merchant toy and the resulting technologies became immensely profitable as well as useful for warfare and ravaging the Earth, all performed with great rationality. Economics was crowned the science of sciences – all hail rationality, all hail enlightenment.

True, those peasants had no indoor toilets, toilet paper, household running water, ducted heat and air conditioning, electricity, autos, supermarkets, pharmaceuticals, electronic toys, vitamin and mineral supplements, petrochemical clothing and shoes, physicians, nor CostCo, Home Depot, nor Wallmart. Poor dears. However did they live? In fact, while plagues and wars were usual, I’ve found while investigating my own peasant ancestry back in several places to the seventh century and a couple to the sixteenth that they generally lived only a few years less than we do on average without all our expensive patches.

As far as I can tell, “Decrees from on high – often issued by an unholy alliance of religious fundamentalists, self-interested corporations, and greedy fat cats – are offered up as reality by rightwing politicians,” has been the rule in English speaking counties since at least the seventeenth century, with science and technology being leading nursemaids and too often “science” replacing “religious”; witness Monsanto and GMOs. “If your science gives you results you don’t like,” pretend it didn’t happen. I’ll take the ignorant Dark Age lords and ladies with all their silly superstitions, thank you.