From AL NORMAN
Thanks to Steve Scalmanini
[This report MUST be included in any environmental impact reports produced by Costco and Wal-Mart for Ukiah and Mendocino County. -DS]
They don’t teach “Wal-Math” in American high schools, but here’s how it works: 1 job created – 1 job destroyed = 1 job.
Wal-Mart has never admitted the difference between gross jobs and net jobs. That’s why when Wal-Mart opened its only store in Chicago, Illinois on the west side, the retailer said: “This store will show what a great asset Wal-Mart can be to the community, as an employer and corporate citizen.” From Day One of its drive to locate stores in the Windy City, Wal-Mart based its case on jobs.
One of Wal-Mart’s most vocal apologists is Alderman Howard Brookins of the city’s 21st Ward on the South Side. “We need jobs, plain and simple,” the Alderman likes to repeat. Brookins has been so outspoken on the issue of Wal-Mart and jobs that The Chicago Tribune has referred to him as “the Alderman from Wal-Mart.”
But the jobs argument isn’t adding up in Chicago. A new study from Loyola University and the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) has put the giant retailer on the economic defensive once again.
The study, The Impact of an Urban Wal-Mart Store on Area Businesses: An Evaluation of One Chicago Neighborhood’s Experience found that Wal-Mart’s opening in Chicago has produced a loss of 300 full-time jobs.
Researchers conclude that the probability of a local retailer going out of business during the study period was significantly higher for establishments close to Wal-Mart’s location. The loss of jobs in the trade area near Wal-Mart just about balanced out any ‘new’ jobs attributable to Wal-Mart. “These estimates support the contention that urban Wal-Mart stores absorb retail sales from other city stores without significantly expanding the market,” the researchers say.
“What we’re seeing here is that placing a Wal-Mart in an urban setting is basically a ‘wash’ in terms of sales revenue for the city and jobs for local residents,” explains the study’s co-author David Merriman, head of UIC’s economics department. “This means that communities around the city should not see Wal-Mart, and other big-box retailers, as a panacea to local economic struggles.”
The two universities collected data pre-Wal-Mart, post-Wal-Mart, and post-Wal-Mart long-term. Data was collected from March of 2006 until November of 2008. A total of 306 enterprises were tracked, and the research team found that 82 (27%)of them went out of business during the study period.
A key finding of the survey is that the probability of going out of business is significantly higher for businesses close to Wal-Mart. Being located close to Wal-Mart was particularly toxic for retailers selling electronics, toys, office supplies, general merchandise, hardware, home furnishings, and drugs. Apparently being near Wal-Mart foot traffic did not translate into increased sales for other merchants. As the Wal-Mart commercials used to say: “Next stop, home.”
Based on their analysis of retail sales, the researchers conclude: “These estimates support the contention that large-city Wal-Marts absorb retail sales from other city stores without significantly expanding the market…Overall, the weight of evidence suggests that the Wal-Mart opening on the West Side led to the displacement of a range of businesses. There is no evidence that Wal-Mart sparked any significant net growth in economic activity or employment in the area.”
The researchers in this new study suggest that their findings are very similar to a number of other studies on “the Wal-Mart effect” that have been published since the 1980s. “Under the circumstances,” the new study says, “claims that the Chicago Wal-Mart has led to significant economic development in nearby areas must be considered skeptically.”
Wal-Mart has been trying to break into the Chicago market like gangbusters since the spring of 2004 — almost a six year epic struggle. The Chicago City Council responded in part to Wal-Mart’s push by passing a “big box living wage” ordinance, which Chicago Mayor Richard Daley vetoed.
The West Side Wal-Mart opened in the fall of 2006. To further enhance its chances of opening additional stores, Wal-Mart announced that this West Side store was going to be part of a national campaign launched by Wal-Mart called “Jobs and Opportunity Zones (JOZ).” Wal-Mart promised that it would select five small local businesses for advertisements in local newspapers and on Wal-Mart’s in-store radio network. Wal-Mart also pledged to host workshops for small businesses on how to “survive & thrive” with a Wal-Mart nearby. A grant of $300,000 would be donated to local chambers of commerce to create effective programs for the funds.
But researchers from Loyola and UIC interviewed 2 of the 5 businesses selected to be part of the JOZ program. Both businesses claimed that Wal-Mart did buy ads for their businesses in local newspapers — but neither attended any Wal-Mart seminars. One owner called the Wal-Mart initiative “pretty much a failure.” Instead of a Jobs and Opportunity Zone — 27% of area businesses surveyed literally entered their final Twilight Zone.
This new Chicago study confirms research conducted by economists Ken Stone, Tom Mueller, David Neumark, and others that reveal the dark side of Wal-Mart’s economic impacts. One earlier study showed that each Wal-Mart worker replaces about 1.4 non-Wal-Mart retail workers. The group Retail Forward concluded in 2003 that “for every Wal-Mart supercenter that opens in the next five years, two supermarkets will close their doors.”
And what was Wal-Mart’s response to this less-than-flattering study? According to the local ABC affiliate in Chicago, Wal-Mart’s only comment was that the research was funded by “a group with ties to labor.”
The Loyola/UIC study should blow away any notion that Wal-Mart is a job-generator in the Windy City. More than three years after coming to Chicago, Wal-Mart has produced no new jobs, no new opportunities –just a great big shift in market share. As Alderman Brookins might say, that’s the ‘plain and simple’ consequence of inviting Wal-Mart to sit at your table.
Al Norman is the founder of Sprawl-Busters. For the past 16 years he has helped hundreds of communities fight big box sprawl. His books are “Slam Dunking Wal-Mart,” and “The Case Against Wal-Mart.”